钢材的夏比冲击试验：第一部分
低温用高锰奥氏体钢
核材料辐照效应：第一部分
钛合金渗氮：第一部分
DataPLUS 模块提供上万种金属材料和非金属材料的腐蚀数据、焊接性能、尺寸与公差信息以及涂层信息。 点击这里了解更多。
New Developments in Total Materia: New datasets, Compliance and more 2019年4月4日
Introduction to Total Materia 2019年5月7日
New Developments in Total Materia: New datasets, Compliance and more 2019年6月6日
在使用Total Materia几个月之后，以及深刻体验过所有潜在功能之后，我非常感谢你们的卓越工作和持续稳定的升级服务。 Total Materia始终是用来达成这一目的唯一工具。
M. Manfredini Bonfiglioli Industrial Gearmotors 博洛尼亚, 意大利
我们的目标很简单,就是让 Total Materia成为全球工程师在材料领域的首选一站式解决方案
Prof. Dr. Viktor Pocajt, CEOKey to Metals AG
Traditional design implements the safety factor (SF) as a safety measure of a structure. The allowed stresses are calculated from the Yield Stress (YS) or Ultimate Tensile Stress (UTS) and SF ratio. This approach gives satisfactory results only for structures in which plastic yielding is expected to occur, i.e. when no brittle fracture is expected. A.A. Griffith was the first to introduce in 1920 both the importance of the presence of defects, named cracks, and the first calculations for cracked solid materials. Since then, further modifications and improvements have established fracture mechanics as a reliable methodology for the prediction of service behavior of materials and components.
Failure of a component or a structure can be attributed to numerous reasons, as showed in Figure 1; causes of failure can be classified in two groups, i.e. causes driven by design activities (positions 2 and 3) and causes driven by fabrication procedure in all steps (positions 1, and 4 to 6).
It can be concluded that the major reasons for failure are related to fabrication, service, and maintenance, i.e. activities depending on “human factor”. For this group of factors, the performance and reliability of structures can be improved by the implementation of more strict quality assurance and better controlled operations.
On the other hand, about 29.3% of all failures are caused by poor design or standards. Therefore, this segment has come into the focus of research efforts, primarily due to high price and importance of vital structures, such as nuclear and power plants, aerospace, and military applications.
Figure 1: Causes for failure of steel structures: 1-poor quality of material (6.3%); 2-inappropriate project solution (design) (25.1%); 3-doubious standards (4.2%); 4-inappropriate strength/properties (0.4%); 5-irresponsible manipulation, service and maintenance (15.7%); 6-errors in fabrication and finalization of component/structures (48.3%).
Material design is usually based on the following requirements:
Traditional design implements the safety factor (SF) as a safety measure of a structure. The allowed stresses are calculated from the Yield Stress (YS) or Ultimate Tensile Stress (UTS) and SF ratio. This approach gives satisfactory results only for structures in which plastic yielding is expected to occur, i.e. when no brittle fracture is expected.
The YS to UTS ratio was also used, due to the "strength reserve" between values of YS and UTS, i.e. if plastic yielding occurs, large strain and strength increase can be measured. This approach is almost abandoned, because for example microalloyed steels have much higher YS in comparison to carbon or carbon-manganese steels, while the UTS is of similar values. These steels have strongly questioned the reliability of classic design calculations. Both approaches have not answered to the need of safe design against brittle fracture.
A.A. Griffith was the first to introduce in 1920 both the importance of the presence of defects, named cracks, and the first calculations for cracked solid materials. During the next 80 years, modifications and improvements of Griffith's early work have established fracture mechanics as a reliable methodology for the prediction of service behavior of materials and components. Of course, since there is no perfect methodology, fracture mechanics should be used bearing in mind all its limitations.
Fracture condition for an infinite plate with through-thickness crack is given by:
This relationship may be used in several ways to design against a component failure. Its significance lies in the fact that the designer must make a decision what is the most important feature in component service and design: (a) materials properties, (b) the stress level, or (3) the crack size that can be tolerated for safe operation of the part. After making the decision, i.e. specifying two parameters in equation 1, the third parameter is easily calculated.
This simple equation has imposed a major challenge to all materials scientists and the development of materials with KIC as high as possible has become a high priority. In Tables 1 and 2, the roles of major alloying elements in steel and (as an example) one Al alloy, are listed.
It is clear that the increase of toughness in steel requires either mechanism of grain refinement and/or alloying with nickel. On the other hand, toughness is not the only requirement for a material. Therefore, the development of materials that can meet all requirements together with reasonably low cost is a long-term challenge. The response of material scientists in the previous century and the contribution of fracture mechanics will be described on the development of steel.
Date Published: May-2009
输入搜索词：
搜索项
全文 关键字
标题 摘要
本文属于一系列文章。点击下面的链接，你可以看到有关这个话题的更多文章。
Total Materia Extended Range includes the largest database of fracture mechanics parameters for hundreds of metal alloys and heat treatments conditions. K1C, KC, crack growth and Paris law parameters are given, with the corresponding graph of crack growth.
Monotonic properties are added for the reference, as well as estimates of missing parameters based on monotonic properties where applicable.
Enter the material of interest into the quick search field. You can optionally narrow your search by specifying the country/standard of choice in the designated field and click Search.
After clicking the material from the resulting list, a list of subgroups that are standard specifications appears.
Because Total Materia Extended Range fracture mechanics parameters are neutral to standard specifications, you can review fracture mechanics data by clicking the appropriate link for any of the subgroups.
The data are given in a tabular format, with the Paris curve (Region II) where applicable. Explicit references to the data sources are given for each dataset.
For you’re a chance to take a test drive of the Total Materia database, we invite you to join a community of over 150,000 registered users through the Total Materia Free Demo.